View Full Version : Myndighetene lyver om 9/11 sier fysikkprofessorer
Professorer i fysikk hevder myndighetene lyver om 11. september
I november 2005 skrev Deseret News en artikkel (http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635160132,00.html) om Professor Steven E. Jones som i en vitenskapelig analyse (http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html) hevder at eksplosiver plassert på innsiden World Trade Center fikk byggene til å kollapse. Nå står han fram sammen med en gruppe fysikere og vitenskapsmenn for å få fakta frem i nyhetsbildet, skriver Deseret News i en ny artikkel (http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635179751,00.html). Gruppen håper media rundt omkring i verden vil be eksperter i deres områder om å undersøke gruppens funn og påstander. "Da vil en av tidenes største skrøner blotte seg foran øynene på en hel verden," sier de.
Fox 40 News har et innslag om Bushkonspirasjonen.
del1 (http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/fox.wmv) - del2 (http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/2005-12-02-Terror-Conspiracy.wmv)
Webserveren deres ble overbelastet etter innslaget. video (http://www.lonelantern.org/downloads/fox_lc2e_c.mpg)
Krigen mot terror er en bløff (http://home.chello.no/~trondh/911/)
TheTrader
04-02-2006, 11:48
Dæven Trond, der har du jammen gjort en grundig jobb med å sette sammen den storyen! Applaus for grundig arbeid!
Jeg er uansett veldig skeptisk til alle typer konspirasjonsteorier. Når disse blir lansert vil jeg i det minste se noen ord som viser at folk har litt distanse til seg selv og litt selvkritisk analyse av konspirasjonsteorien.
"Krigen mot terror" er selvfølgelig et tvilsomt begrep uansett.
Dæven Trond, der har du jammen gjort en grundig jobb med å sette sammen den storyen! Applaus for grundig arbeid!
Jeg er uansett veldig skeptisk til alle typer konspirasjonsteorier. Når disse blir lansert vil jeg i det minste se noen ord som viser at folk har litt distanse til seg selv og litt selvkritisk analyse av konspirasjonsteorien.
"Krigen mot terror" er selvfølgelig et tvilsomt begrep uansett.
Takk :)
Å konspirere betyr å slutte seg sammen for å ødelegge el. skade noe(n)
Enten har Ali BinLaden og de 19 kaprerne konspirert
eller så har Bush og de hemmelighetsfulle FBI-medlemmene konspirert.
Hva er mest sannsynlig?
Stemmer den offisielle konspirasjonsteorien med virkeligheten og bildene?
Grunnen til at det oppstår alternative teorier til offisielle konspirasjonsteorier er at de offisielle eventyrene ikke matcher videoene, bildene og virkeligheten generelt.
Yahoo News:
Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax
Mon Jan 30, 11:37 AM ET
(PRWEB) - Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.
They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.
These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent "another Pearl Harbor."
They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking.
They are encouraging news services around the world to secure scientific advice by taking advantage of university resources to verify or to falsify their discoveries. Extraordinary situations, they believe, require extraordinary measures.
If this were done, they contend, one of the great hoaxes of history would stand naked before the eyes of the world and its perpetrators would be clearly exposed, which may be the only hope for saving this nation from ever greater abuse.
They hope this might include The New York Times, which, in their opinion, has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expecedt from our nation's newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable lapses. It has failed to vigorously investigate tainted elections, lies leading to the war in Iraq, or illegal NSA spying on the American people, major unconstitutional events. In their view, The Times might compensate for its loss of stature by helping to reveal the truth about one of the great turning-point events of modern history.
Stunning as it may be to acknowledge, they observe, the government has brought but one indictment against anyone and, to the best of their knowledge, has not even reprimanded anyone for incompetence or dereliction of duty. The official conspiracy theory--that nineteen Arab hijackers under control of one man in the wilds of Afghanistan brought this about--is unsupportable by the evidential data, which they have studied. They even believe there are good reasons for suspecting that video tapes officially attributed to Osama bin Laden are not genuine.
They have found the government's own investigiation to be severely flawed. The 9/11 Commission, designated to investigate the attack, was directed by Philip Zelikow, part of the Bush transition team in the NSA sector and the co-author of a book with Condoleezza Rice. A Bush supporter and director of national security affairs, he could hardly be expected to conduct an objective and impartial investigation.
They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin has documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely ignores the collapse of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by no airplanes, was only damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the attack.
Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholar find profoundly troubling:
* In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?
* The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How is this possible?
* Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?
* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?
* Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this possible?
* Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this possible?
* Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible?
* A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this possible?
* A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is this possible?
* The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this possible?
Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints.
These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality."
# # #
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
James Fetzer
218 724-2706
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/prweb/20060130/bs_prweb/prweb339303_5
"Krigen mot terror" er selvfølgelig et tvilsomt begrep uansett.
Terror betyr frykt. Terrorist betyr fryktspreder. Når FBI fant passene til de arabiske kaprerne som FBI på en eller annen måte klarte å knytte til Osama, så fortalte Bush at Osama hadde angrepet USA og at motivet hans var at han hatet den amerikanske frihet.
3 år senere klarte supermannen Osama Bin Laden å karre seg på TV for å kritisere Bush for dette tåpelige motivet:
"Bush's claim that we hate freedom. If so, then let him explain to us why we don't strike for example - Sweden?" - Osama Bin Laden
http://www.couplescompany.com/Features/Politics/2004/BinLadenText.htm
Laden hevder Bush er virkelighetsfjern. Laden er klar over at Norge og Sverige er mer fritt enn USA. Bush skjønner ikke hva Laden prater om her og tror Laden bare babler, for Bush er selv sikker på at Amerika er "the land of the free".
Hvis Laden skulle klart å knuse 3 skyskrapere midt i USA og uforhindret klare å angripe USAs sikreste bygg, så ville han ha vært verdensleder. Hva blir det neste? Plutselig faller det Hvite Hus sammen?
Laden har iallefall bedre motiver på lager om han skulle ha gjort det:
"The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were killed and injured and others were terrorized and displaced.
I couldn't forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their occupants and high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining down on our home without mercy.
The situation was like a crocodile meeting a helpless child, powerless except for his screams. Does the crocodile understand a conversation that doesn't include a weapon? And the whole world saw and heard but it didn't respond."
Så er det mulig for Bushkrokodillen å starte en samtale med et lite barn uten å skyte tusenvis av skremmeskudd vilt rundt seg først? Eller er det plakat umulig?
Lysglimt
05-02-2006, 23:12
Hei Trond, velkomment til forumet! :)
Må si meg enig med TheTrader i at du har gjort en interessant jobb med å sette sammen nettsidene om disse teoriene.
Personlig er jeg veldig skeptisk til konspirasjonsteorier. Men dette belyser interessante sider ved saken.
Hei Trond, velkomment til forumet! :)
Må si meg enig med TheTrader i at du har gjort en interessant jobb med å sette sammen nettsidene om disse teoriene.
Personlig er jeg veldig skeptisk til konspirasjonsteorier. Men dette belyser interessante sider ved saken.
Heio, og takk :) Jeg har tidligere vært negativ til "konspirasjonsteorier". Det har fått et negativt stempel, men de offisielle teoriene er også konspirasjonsteorier. De teoriene som strider imot de offisielle og de store nyhetskanalenes teorier er blitt stemplet som de negative "konspirasjonsteoriene".
Petter Nome sa noe positivt om hasj i NRK en gang, og han ble suspendert eller fikk sparken. Det er ikke akkurat ytringsfrihet her i landet heller. For en amerikaner å si at de ikke tror på Bush sine teorier er nesten som å si at du røyker hasj i et land hvor det er dødsstraff for å røyke.
Men stadig flere amerikanere har fått med seg hva som egentlig hendte, og det blir stadig mer akseptert å si det. Rett etter 11. september var amerikanerne i "sjokk", og kunne knapt annet enn å hate den felles fienden de hadde fått. Men nå står jo fysikkprofessorer fram og prøver å nå media, så da går det framover. Med internett er bevisene tilgjengelig for alle og enhver, så det vil bli slutt på alle de hemmelige operasjonene til politi-folkene i politistaten USA i framtiden :)
Når Oklahoma-bygget ble bombet var den offisielle historien at en terrorist hadde parkert en bil utenfor med en bombe. FBI hadde funnet det eneste som var igjen av bilen, en bit fra motoren, med motornummeret. Deretter hadde de funnet ut at bilen var leid og de hadde innhentet informasjon om hvem som hadde leid bilen. Terroristen tok selvmord når han ble oppdaget.
Faktum er at det ble funnet to bomber til i kjelleren av bygget. Disse var større enn den første som hadde gått av og ble desarmert av bombeeksperter på stedet. Dette ble rapportert LIVE på lokale nyhetsstasjoner, men ble ikke nevnt i CNN. Amerikanere flest vet ikke om dette.
Jeg så denne FBI etterforskingen i et program på National Geographic for noen år siden. Jeg syntes det virket urealistisk at det eneste som var igjen av bilen var motornummeret. FBI-etterforskerne virket litt for supre i etterforskningen sin. Men jeg ble ikke klar over at det faktisk var funnet to bomber til før jeg så opptak av LIVE-sendingene for noen uker siden.
20 min 14 sek inn i denne videoen:
http://www.lonelantern.org/downloads/911%20-%20In%20Plane%20Site%20Directors%20Cut%20Part%202. wmv
TheTrader
25-02-2006, 02:33
http://villagevoice.com/news/index.php?issue=0608&page=murphy&id=72254
"Da vil en av tidenes største skrøner blotte seg foran øynene på en hel verden," sier de.
Jeg vet ikke.. de flyene som ble videotapet da de fløy inn i bygningene, var de kanskje bare hologrammer eller noe?
Amerikansk akademia er notorisk venstreinfisert, så man må være svært påpasselig når noen med tittel "professor" står fram og uttaler seg og politiske temaer. I disse kretsene er anti-amerikanismen rotfestet.
Krigen mot terror er en bløff (http://home.chello.no/~trondh/911/)
Kanskje det. Men krigen mot militant islam er ingen bløff, eller rettere: Den krig som militant islam har erklært mot Vesten er ingen bløff. Eller er alle de siste terroranslagene (Bali, Madrid, London osv.) avledningsmanøvre fra CIA for å skape et skarpere fiendebilde?
Det er vel nok av dem som tror dette også, eller ønsker at vi andre skal tro dette. Yndlingstemaet på venstresiden er jo at CIA (o.l.) iverksetter konspirasjoner for å bli bedre tilgodesett med bevilgninger, og dermed karrieremuligheter for toppskiktet.
MVH
PAR
"Da vil en av tidenes største skrøner blotte seg foran øynene på en hel verden," sier de.
Jeg vet ikke.. de flyene som ble videotapet da de fløy inn i bygningene, var de kanskje bare hologrammer eller noe?
Amerikansk akademia er notorisk venstreinfisert, så man må være svært påpasselig når noen med tittel "professor" står fram og uttaler seg og politiske temaer. I disse kretsene er anti-amerikanismen rotfestet.
Krigen mot terror er en bløff (http://home.chello.no/~trondh/911/)
Kanskje det. Men krigen mot militant islam er ingen bløff, eller rettere: Den krig som militant islam har erklært mot Vesten er ingen bløff. Eller er alle de siste terroranslagene (Bali, Madrid, London osv.) regissert av CIA for å skape et skarpere fiendebilde?
Det er vel nok av dem som tro dette også. Yndlingstemaet er jo at CIA (ol) iverksetter konspirasjoner for å bli bedre tilgodesett med bevilgninger, og dermed karrieremuligheter for toppskiktet.
MVH
PAR
Jeg vet ikke.. de flyene som ble videotapet da de fløy inn i bygningene, var de kanskje bare hologrammer eller noe?
Selvsagt var det fly som fløy inn i WTC 1 og 2. Videoene og bildene viser det. Det andre flykrasjet ble vist LIVE over hele verden. Så det skal du ikke tvile på. Men det fløy ikke noe fly inn i WTC7. Syv timer etter at tvillingtårnene hadde kollapset så falt WTC7 pladask i bakken på 6.6 sekunder. Et fly krasj eller en brann kan uansett ikke få 110 etasjer med stålskjelett til å bli pulverisert, hverken på 10 sekunder eller 10 timer. Tårnene ble plutselig pulverisert og jevnet med jorden på under 10 sekunder. Flykrasjet startet en brannn i de øverste etasjene. En time senere hadde brannen nesten slukket. Plutselig ble hele tårnet pulverisert. Den eneste mulige forklaringen er eksplosiver på innsiden.
Men i Pentagon var det ingen fly som krasjet :)
http://home.chello.no/~trondh/911/hole2_ns.jpg
Dette bildet ble tatt rett etter angrepet. Her er det ingen vraksrester etter et stort passasjerfly. Et fly har bensinen i vingene og bensineksplosjonene ville ha vært på hver side av sentrum. Veggen rundt hullet er uskadet. Ingen tegn etter vinger som har truffet noe. 20 minutter senere kollapset plutselig veggen:
http://home.chello.no/~trondh/911/before_collapsed_wall_liten_ns.jpg http://home.chello.no/~trondh/911/collapsed_wall_liten2_ns.jpg http://home.chello.no/~trondh/911/collapsed_wall_liten_ns.jpg
Veggen så stødig ut før den falt ganske pent og symmetrisk sammen. Kanskje det lille hullet ikke var overbevisende nok? Personlig synes jeg fortsatt ikke det ser ut som om en Boeing 757 har krasjet her. Ser mer ut som et båtkrasj. CNN (http://www.lonelantern.org/downloads/The%20757%20and%20the%20Pentagon.wmv) rapporterte LIVE at de også oppfattet krasjstedet som litt betenkelig:
"From my closeup inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only sight is the actual side of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tailsection, wingsections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon."
http://home.chello.no/~trondh/911/pentagon_ovenifra_liten2_ns.jpg http://home.chello.no/~trondh/911/pentagon_ovenifra_liten_ns.jpg http://home.chello.no/~trondh/911/hull_i_ring_c3_liten_ns.jpg
Det ble også et hull i den midterste ringen, ring C. Myndighetenes forklaring på hullet var at nesen på det kaprede flyet hadde laget det. Myndighetene må tro folk er svært dumme. Det har vært mye skepsis rundt forklaringen og Popular Mechanics (http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&c=y) forsøker å avvise skeptikernes påstander om at det var en inside job, så de har kommet med en annen forklaring på hva som laget hullet. De har kommet fram til at det var landingshjulet til flyet som hadde laget dette. Det etter å ha trillet gjennom seks betongvegger (tre ringer), for så å ha blitt oppløst på samme måte som resten av flyet.
HOLE TRUTH: Flight 77’s landing gear punched a 12-ft. hole into the Pentagon’s Ring C
The hole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help us God, to make our lies come true
Test din oppfattingsevne her (http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm) og se om du kan finne Boeingen.
Hvis du ønsker å se videoene som viser hva som fløy inn i Pentagon så kan du skrive under her (http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/929981172?ltl=1141950620)
Scholars Call for Release of 9/11 Information
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND
OF THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:*
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT,
On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the Undersigned Scholars for 9/11 Truth Hereby Petitions for, and hereby demands, Release of the Following kinds of documents, video and films, and physical evidence to the public for study by experts and scholars investigating the events of 9/11:
1. Immediate release of the full Pentagon surveillance tapes, of which five frames (only) have been released via the official ASCE report, as Judicial Watch has also requested. We further demand release of the video tape seized by FBI agents minutes after the Pentagon hit, from the fuel service station near the Pentagon, as well as any other videotape which shows the 9/11 strike on the Pentagon.
See
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/12/1211_wirepentagon.html
http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2000/b05012000_bt218-00.html
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/May2000/20005022a.jpg
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/pages-en/fct-videos.html
2. Immediate release of 6,899 photographs and 6,977 segments of video footage held by NIST, largely from private photographers, regarding the collapses of WTC buildings on 9/11/2001 (NIST, 2005, p. 81). In particular, all footage relating to the collapse of WTC 7 (including shots before, during and after the collapse) must be released immediately, without waiting for the NIST report on WTC 7, which is long overdue and may be prolonged indefinitely...
12 krav (http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/929981172?ltl=1141950620)
March 22, 2006:
Sheen normally gets laughs as the bachelor on the hit CBS sitcom, "Two and a Half Men".
SHEEN: Wow, you`re even better than a dog.
HAMMER: But now, Sheen is courting controversy by questioning the official story on 9/11.
SHEEN: We`re not the conspiracy theorists on this particular issue, you know. It seems to me like, you know, 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75 percent of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory.
HAMMER: So what exactly are Sheen`s questions about 9/11?
For one, Sheen is questioning the official story of what caused the World Trade Center clasp, that the impact of the two planes caused fires that weakened the buildings` support columns. In the interview Sheen says he wondered if the buildings could have been brought down by a deliberate - - yes, deliberate -- implosion.
SHEEN: I saw the south tower hit live, that famous wide shot where it disappears behind the building and then we see the tremendous fireball. And there was just -- there was a feeling that it just didn`t look, how do I say this, it didn`t look like any commercial jetliner I`ve flown on any time in my life.
And then when the buildings came down, later on that day, I was with my brother and I said, "Hey, call me insane, but did it sort of look like those buildings came down in a -- in a controlled demolition?"
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0603/22/sbt.01.html
March 23, 2006:
HAMMER: The questions Charlie Sheen is raising about the 9/11 attacks are raising a lot of eyebrows. Our e-mail inbox immediately started to overflow. And the coverage on SHOWBIZ TONIGHT is getting a lot of attention.
The web site 9/11 Blogger calls SHOWBIZ TONIGHT`s coverage, quote, "The first time a major news station has covered 9/11 questions in any reasonable format."
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0603/23/sbt.01.html
March 24, 2006:
ALEX JONES, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: Thank you for having me.
HAMMER: Appreciate you being here.
So let`s talk about the fact that people are going after Charlie. We`ve gotten a lot of e-mails where people are attempting to attack his credibility. That`s the natural thing that`s going to happen. They`re talking about things that happened a long time ago. What about this? Is his past at all a liability, as you see it, or are these attacks basically going to backfire?
JONES: Let me just say this. CNN had a poll a year ago; 90 percent on CNN on the Anderson Cooper show believed the government`s covering up 9/11 and may be involved. Your new poll five minutes ago before show time, 81 percent of over 20,000 respondents, 81 percent agree with Charlie Sheen, as I told you.
And they`ve had many other polls with other news services and we get the same type of numbers. On my own talk show and other talk shows I`ve done, we get the same type of response. You have a minority that won`t face the facts.
Listen, Charlie Sheen is the first person to go public. He`s just the first Hollywood person that has the courage to do what he`s been doing. We have former Reagan administration officials. We have former Bush Senior officials. We have the current chief economist from George Bush`s current administration who quit just a couple years ago and has gone public. And he says the government carried out the attacks. Defense ministers, members of British...
[...]
ERICA JONG, AUTHOR, "SEDUCING THE DEMON": Great to be here.
HAMMER: A fired up show tonight.
JONG: It really is exciting.
HAMMER: We were speaking a few moments ago about Charlie Sheen coming forward this week with his notion that the government may actually have been behind September 11 and the September 11 attacks and the conspiracy theories in general surrounding 9/11.
What do you make of an actor of his stature coming out publicly like that?
JONG: I think he`s a brave man to even question this aloud in an environment where anyone has been saying that anyone questions the government is a traitor.
So Charlie Sheen has done his homework, and he`s asking questions. He`s speaking truth to power, which is a brave thing to do.
Look, the young people in my family, my nephews, for example, have been saying for the past three, four years that we are not learning everything about 9/11 that we`re meant to learn. And specifically, they`ve been saying that if you read all the different web sites, if you`re really careful, what you discover is that a lot of facts don`t add up.
HAMMER: And even if a modicum of what is being put out there, all these conspiracy theories, even if a piece of that is true, we have a responsibility, don`t you think...
JONG: To investigate it.
HAMMER: ... to be asking the questions and to be doing the investigation?
JONG: I think it`s very patriotic to investigate it. Throughout all of history the basic premise of tyrants has been -- dictators, shall we say. And I think it`s fair to say that George W. Bush is a dictator. Has been if you tell the people they have an external enemy, they`ll follow you anywhere. That was what Goebbels told Hitler to do. Back in ancient history, that`s what Roman emperors did.
HAMMER: That`s a pretty strong statement for you to say, though. Are you at all afraid of a backlash? I mean, seriously, a lot of people are afraid to come out on television. You just called Mr. Bush a dictator.
JONG: I think that he is a dictator. Most of the people do not believe that this country should be a theocracy. Most of the people in this country do not want to be in Iraq. Most of the people in this country are pro choice. And yet, he blithely goes on ignoring the will of the people. I call that a dictator.
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0603/24/sbt.01.html
videoene (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rINKezJ_EYw&search=charlie%20sheen%20alex%20jones%20september% 2011th%20911%20news)
QUICKVOTE:
Do you agree with Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks?
Totalt svar: 50.000
Yes: 84%
No: 16%
If you're looking for a reason why Zacarias Moussaoui suddenly testified today to a version of the 9/11 plotline that sounds more like the Official story than even the official Whitewash Commission report, this video may have the answer.
http://total911.info/zacmstun.wmv
In it, NBC news reporter Pete Williams lets slip that Moussaoui is wearing a "Stun belt" underneath his clothing controlled by US Marshals. MSNBC host Dan Abrams gets some more details on the stun belt.
http://www.total911.info/2006/03/msnbc-video-moussaoui-wore-stun-belt.html
One of the most obvious lies in the show trial of Zacarias Moussaoui came when a court-appointed physician, Dr. Raymond Patterson, declared Moussaoui was not suffering from mental illness. Patterson made the assertion after Moussaoui said he wanted to fire his lawyers and represent himself. Moussaoui’s lawyers “became convinced that their client’s mental condition, already precarious, was deteriorating under the stress of solitary confinement, and that he was becoming increasingly paranoid,” writes Seymour Hersh for the New Yorker. In response to Patterson’s assertion that Moussaoui was sane enough to present his own defense, two “mental-health experts retained by the defense, Dr. Xavier Amador, of Columbia University, and Dr. William Stejskal, of the University of Virginia, argued that Patterson’s conclusions were unfounded and that Moussaoui needed further evaluation.” Judge Brinkema did not agree and ruled from the bench on June 13th, 2002, without hearing testimony, “that the defendant met the legal standard of competency.”
In fact, Zacarias Moussaoui is a stark raving lunatic, given to paranoid outbursts in the courtroom, and he was deemed sane for the simple reason that the government needs a conviction to prop up its ludicrous whitewash commission fairy tale about “al-Qaeda” cave dwellers attacking America on September 11, 2001.
http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=303
NBC news reporter Pete Williams (http://www.total411.info/) speculates that the feds have rigged a defiant Zacarias Moussaoui with a stun belt (http://www.securityprousa.com/prstbeshbeco.html), an "electro-shock" device, apparently part of a growing "shock technology" arsenal used by torturers in South Africa, China, and Lebanon." Amnesty International (http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR510451996?open&of=ENG-390) is extremely concerned about the introduction by the prison authorities in the United States of America of a remote controlled electro-shock stun belt for use on prisoners in chain gangs, judicial hearings and transportation," the human rights organization declared in 1996. "Officers can use it to psychologically
threaten a prisoner, and it appears designed to humiliate and degrade a prisoner… Data from other electro-shock weapons indicate that the high pulse 50,000 volt shocks lasting eight seconds at a time could result in longer term physical and mental injuries."
http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials/signs20060329_StunningZacariasMoussaouiintoSubmiss ion.php
Moussaoui - Mind Programmed Patsy
http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials/signs20060328_MoussaouiMindProgrammedPatsy.php
Local News Coverage of Oklahoma City Bombing (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMXMo3Z0qms#GU5U2spHI_4)
Den offisielle historien var at en terrorist hadde parkert en bil med en bombe utenfor Murrah-bygningen. At det ble funnet to bomber til inne i bygningen ble ikke nevnt på CNN eller noen av de andre store nyhetsstasjonene.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.